zlacker

>>vforgi+(OP)
This is so stupid its exactly what you would expect in congress.

If this was to go through, of course OpenAI and co will be the primary lobbiests to ensure they get to define the filters for such a license.

Also how would you even enforce this. It's absolute nonsense and is a clear indicator that these larger companies realize there is no 'gatekeeping' these AI's, that the democratization of models has demonstrated incredible gains over their own.

Edit : Image during the early days of the internet you needed a license to start a website.

In the later days you needed a license to start a social media site.

Nonsense.

>>bileka+f9
Yeah. Regulation is fine, if thoughtfully done. "Licensing" is ridiculous. We all know the intent - OpenAI gets the first license along with a significant say in who else gets a license. No thanks.

>>DebtDe+7C
Problem is that regulation is rarely thoughtfully done. It's almost always a knee jerk response to the new thing.