zlacker

[return to "Sam Altman goes before US Congress to propose licenses for building AI"]
1. bileka+f9[view] [source] 2023-05-16 12:09:29
>>vforgi+(OP)
This is so stupid its exactly what you would expect in congress.

If this was to go through, of course OpenAI and co will be the primary lobbiests to ensure they get to define the filters for such a license.

Also how would you even enforce this. It's absolute nonsense and is a clear indicator that these larger companies realize there is no 'gatekeeping' these AI's, that the democratization of models has demonstrated incredible gains over their own.

Edit : Image during the early days of the internet you needed a license to start a website.

In the later days you needed a license to start a social media site.

Nonsense.

◧◩
2. nico+YF[view] [source] 2023-05-16 14:55:01
>>bileka+f9
It is nonsense, yet a similar thing happened recently with texting

Before Twilio et al, if you wanted to text a lot of your customers automatically, you had to pay thousands of dollars in setup and recurrent fees to rent a shortcode number

But then, with Twilio et al, you don’t need a shortcode anymore

The telcos told the regulators this would create endless spam, so they would regulate it themselves, and created a consortium to “end spam”

Now you are forced to get a license from them, pay a monthly fee, get audited, and they still let pretty much all the spam through, while they also randomly block a certain % of your messages, even if you are fully compliant

◧◩◪
3. theGnu+Xt1[view] [source] 2023-05-16 18:35:57
>>nico+YF
they can't even stop robocalls.
[go to top]