zlacker

>>vforgi+(OP)
I'm sad that we've lost the battle with calling these things AI. LLMs aren't AI, and I don't think they're even a path towards AI.

>>candid+gJ
Yeah, what is named AI for now, is not AI at all.

>>vi2837+dS
Something doesn't need to be full human-level general intelligence to be considered as falling under the "AI" rubric. In the past people spoke of "weak AI" versus "strong AI" and/or "narrow AI" vs "wide AI" to reflect the different "levels" of AI. These days the distinction that most people use is "AI" vs "AGI" which you could loosely (very loosely) speaking think of as somewhat analogous to "weak and/or narrow AI" vs "strong, wide AI".