zlacker

>>vforgi+(OP)
OpenAI willing to bend the knee quite deep. If they want to do licensing and filtering and do that without fundamentally bricking the model, then by all means go ahead.

>>skille+fP
It's not bending the knee, that's how they want it to be perceived, but what's really happening is that they're trying to pull up the ladder.

>>mutati+9V
It'll be a temporary 10-year moat at best. Eventually consumer-grade hardware will be exaflop-scale.

>>reaper+oX
By then it will be legally locked down and copyrighted to hell and back.

>>classi+PZ
I'm sorry, what?

- What is OpenAI's level of copyright now?

- How is it going to be more "copyrighted" in the future?

- How does this affect competitors differently in the future vs. the copyright that OpenAI has now?

>>reaper+A11
> What is OpenAI's level of copyright now

Limited. They’re hoping to change that. It’s no secret that open-source models are the long-run competition to the likes of OpenAI.

>>JumpCr+Y31
I don't understand what "Limited" entails. I was pointedly asking for something a bit more specific.

>>reaper+c41
> don't understand what "Limited" entails

Nobody does. It’s being litigated.

They want it legislated. Model weights being proprietary by statute would close off the threat from “consumer-grade hardware” with “exaflop-scale.”