zlacker

[return to "Sam Altman goes before US Congress to propose licenses for building AI"]
1. skille+fP[view] [source] 2023-05-16 15:36:28
>>vforgi+(OP)
OpenAI willing to bend the knee quite deep. If they want to do licensing and filtering and do that without fundamentally bricking the model, then by all means go ahead.
◧◩
2. mutati+9V[view] [source] 2023-05-16 15:58:40
>>skille+fP
It's not bending the knee, that's how they want it to be perceived, but what's really happening is that they're trying to pull up the ladder.
◧◩◪
3. reaper+oX[view] [source] 2023-05-16 16:06:26
>>mutati+9V
It'll be a temporary 10-year moat at best. Eventually consumer-grade hardware will be exaflop-scale.
◧◩◪◨
4. classi+PZ[view] [source] 2023-05-16 16:15:19
>>reaper+oX
By then it will be legally locked down and copyrighted to hell and back.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. reaper+A11[view] [source] 2023-05-16 16:23:08
>>classi+PZ
I'm sorry, what?

- What is OpenAI's level of copyright now?

- How is it going to be more "copyrighted" in the future?

- How does this affect competitors differently in the future vs. the copyright that OpenAI has now?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. JumpCr+Y31[view] [source] 2023-05-16 16:32:10
>>reaper+A11
> What is OpenAI's level of copyright now

Limited. They’re hoping to change that. It’s no secret that open-source models are the long-run competition to the likes of OpenAI.

[go to top]