zlacker

>>tafda+(OP)
20 years is outrageous and very unlikely given his probable experience and making sure no one would be hurt. There is a vast difference in crashing an airplane over a populated area, intentionally wanting to cause harm, and it being accident. Afaik this area is not even populated.

If such a thing happened by accident, you should not get 20 years. If you did so intentionally wanting to cause harm, them perhaps you should get 20+ years, because that would be an act of terrorism. If someone got killed, you should probably not get your freedom back.

Journalists need to always mind the context and emphasize the likelihood of what will be the outcome. It is not really truthful to bluntly state he faces 20 years. If he were to actually get 20, the legal system would obviously be severely flawed. There are murderers that get 20 ffs.

>>FreeCo+871
> There is a vast difference in crashing an airplane over a populated area, intentionally wanting to cause harm

That would be mass murder, and would carry a much harsher penalty than 20 years! In the US, probably life times the number of victims.

> and it being accident

It wasn't an accident. He intentionally crashed his plane. That's the crime he's accused of.