zlacker

>>tafda+(OP)
Harsh, but fair.

>>thrill+q4
Feels overly harsh considering no one was hurt. Send him to jail for a year for obstructing the investigation. It’s not like he’s going to do this again.

>>valine+x5
But they could have been hurt, especially if he kicked off a wildfire or landed on some unsuspecting party.

I mean, we charge people for hiring a hitman, or shooting at someone and missing, even though in both cases nobody is necessarily harmed. 20 years may be excessive, but I'm not sure 'was anyone actually hurt' is a good sentencing guideline either.

>>silisi+o6
In those cases the intent would be to cause harm. Here the intent was not to cause harm, it was just a reckless and bad thing to do.