zlacker

[return to "Tell HN: We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt”"]
1. westur+ds[view] [source] 2023-05-10 14:38:20
>>Jeanne+(OP)
security.txt https://github.com/securitytxt/security-txt :

> security.txt provides a way for websites to define security policies. The security.txt file sets clear guidelines for security researchers on how to report security issues. security.txt is the equivalent of robots.txt, but for security issues.

Carbon.txt: https://github.com/thegreenwebfoundation/carbon.txt :

> A proposed convention for website owners and digital service providers to demonstrate that their digital infrastructure runs on green electricity.

"Work out how to make it discoverable - well-known, TXT records or root domains" https://github.com/thegreenwebfoundation/carbon.txt/issues/3... re: JSON-LD instead of txt, signed records with W3C Verifiable Credentials (and blockcerts/cert-verifier-js)

SPDX is a standard for specifying software licenses (and now SBOMs Software Bill of Materials, too) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Package_Data_Exchange

It would be transparent to disclose the SBOM in AI.txt or elsewhere.

How many parsers should be necessary for https://schema.org/CreativeWork https://schema.org/license metadata for resources with (Linked Data) URIs?

◧◩
2. mtmail+3B[view] [source] 2023-05-10 15:15:42
>>westur+ds
Having a security.txt doesn't stop security researchers asking "Do you have a bounty program?". We replied dozens already that such a file exist, it's not well enough known yet. On the other hand there are search engines crawling those and creating reports, which is nice.
[go to top]