zlacker

>>Berisl+(OP)
>Now, I’m not on the RailsConf committee this year, but I have been on it in the past. I was on it the year that we decided not to make David Hanemeier-Hansson[1], original committer to Rails, the keynote speaker for the first time in sixteen years. That guy melted down in this giant blog post that echoed throughout the halls of the online tech bro cafeteria for weeks.

David Heinemeier-Hansson wasn't the "original committer to Rails". He built the first version of Rails entirely on his own. As he's known to be quite opinionated and harsh in his tone, I read the "melt down" that was mentioned here and I really don't think it reads in that tone at all[2]. While I did find the article here quite interesting and do share some of the sentiment regarding tech conferences, I find this paragraph quite disingenuous.

[1] Misspelling by author

[2] https://world.hey.com/dhh/no-railsconf-faa7935e

>>drita+Tq
I agree it’s a weird way to minimize his role, a sort of rewriting of history, for the same political reasons he was not invited to speak (also for false reasons).

It is a shame that many people who claim to support diversity and tolerance actually have no interest in it.