zlacker

[return to "The largest number representable in 64 bits"]
1. cabiru+Wh1[view] [source] 2023-04-24 00:10:06
>>tromp+(OP)
Even a single bit may be arbitrarily large, depending on the encoding. Encoding may be defined as a language, Turing machine, bb, etc. I can also define a single set bit as 10↑↑100 and beat your busy beaver. It's all arbitrary. A float is also an encoding, and with different mantissa size I may get a larger number.

Now if we count a number of distinct states 64 bits can take, it will still be 18446744073709551615, which I consider the only possible answer.

◧◩
2. tromp+V32[view] [source] 2023-04-24 08:40:20
>>cabiru+Wh1
As the article points out though, there is nothing arbitrary about lambda calculus:

> lack of cheating toward wanted results

[go to top]