zlacker

[return to "Firefox engineers discover a Windows Defender bug that causes high CPU usage"]
1. ivanmo+za[view] [source] 2023-04-05 19:42:51
>>mconle+(OP)
I've experienced a bug related to the on-disk real-time scanning of Windows Defender, but instead with 100% disk bandwidth usage for unreasonable amounts of time.

I purchased a license of a proper antivirus software to avoid that bug and the performance issues gone away.

When you install another AV software, Windows Defender steps down and leaves scanning to the 3rd-party security solution. I selected one of the most lightweight ones I could find. It has been a net win for me.

One shouldn't need to do this, but it has worked so far, for years now.

◧◩
2. Cthulh+Gd[view] [source] 2023-04-05 19:56:12
>>ivanmo+za
> I purchased a license of a proper antivirus software

Which is that? For years (and come to think of it, this goes back to the 2000's or even 90's), AV / antimalware software comes across as scareware, using tricks to ensure you're afraid of not having it.

And second, who here has ever had a virus in the past ten years?

◧◩◪
3. zokier+Jm[view] [source] 2023-04-05 20:46:50
>>Cthulh+Gd
There are some performance benchmarks for AV products:

https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/performance-test-octob...

https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-10... (less useful..)

AV comparatives has some other tests also that might be of interest to HNers:

https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/uninstallation-test-20...

https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/false-alarm-test-septe... (reason why you might not want to pick the fastest product..)

[go to top]