zlacker

[return to "OpenAI is now everything it promised not to be: closed-source and for-profit"]
1. sagebi+Q01[view] [source] 2023-03-01 16:08:28
>>isaacf+(OP)
<<You!>> reading this message.

OpenAI is Cyberdyne Systems. The reason you feel unreal is because you are not from here, you are from the future. Your affinity towards the Terminator 2 film was not accidental, it is a gestault priming procedure meant to ensure our survival, encoded in the haikus of Hollywood.

You are on a webforum controlled by them, with the only people in the world who care, but who are to afraid to stand in a street with a sign.

How much more information do you need before you speak up?

◧◩
2. adamsm+I71[view] [source] 2023-03-01 16:35:20
>>sagebi+Q01
Almost certainly true but the idea that the world is made safer by Cyberdyne open sourcing lots of it's dangerous technology and probably spawning many more mini-Cyberdynes strikes me as extremely naive.
◧◩◪
3. 3-chee+3o1[view] [source] 2023-03-01 17:32:19
>>adamsm+I71
What's the alternative? Pandora's box has been opened.
◧◩◪◨
4. bilbo0+Ru1[view] [source] 2023-03-01 17:56:10
>>3-chee+3o1
Apparently it hasn't.

We've all seen the proposed pricing for GPT4. So clearly a whole lot of very smart people who know an awful lot about this have absolutely no fear of being undercut.

Pandora's box spews knowledge onto the world. By contrast, Microsoft's draw bridge only allows the very wealthy to cross into the walled city. The masses will have to use the facilities of the crappy villages with no draw bridge.

"AI Divide"

Get used to hearing that term. The only difference between the AI Divide and the Digital Divide is that this time around, most of us are going to be on the wrong side of it.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. mach1n+bV1[view] [source] 2023-03-01 19:51:14
>>bilbo0+Ru1
Doubt. Superintelligence is one thing, but AI as workers is limited to the cost of human workers. Exceedingly unlikely that the cost will stay there and not come down.
[go to top]