zlacker

>>isaacf+(OP)
If someone can make money off something, after achieving global visibility, they will - it's almost an iron law. The only exceptions I can think of are Wikipedia, Archive.org, and Wikileaks.

>>toyg+0e
Unfortunately all of those have their own ethical issues, commercial corruption is not the only challenge to well-intentioned initiatives when meeting scale.

>>mellos+Je
What is your point? That moderation issues or bias fights in some articles are equivalent to the concept of Wikipedia being proprietary?

>>unethi+uW
No, my point was that the examples given are not free of significant problems - which generally seem to emerge at scale. I'm an admirer of all the projects named (also OpenAI) in principle, despite their flaws.