zlacker

[return to "OpenAI is now everything it promised not to be: closed-source and for-profit"]
1. mellos+pe[view] [source] 2023-03-01 10:46:59
>>isaacf+(OP)
This seems an important article, if for no other reason than it brings the betrayal of its foundational claim still brazenly present in OpenAI's name from the obscurity of HN comments going back years into the public light and the mainstream.

They've achieved marvellous things, OpenAI, but the pivot and long-standing refusal to deal with it honestly leaves an unpleasant taste, and doesn't bode well for the future, especially considering the enormous ethical implications of advantage in the field they are leading.

◧◩
2. andrep+io[view] [source] 2023-03-01 12:13:25
>>mellos+pe
Seriously, is there anyone naive enough to have swallowed any of their trips? Corporations don't have ethical compasses, much less corporations founded by VCs aka professional salesmen.
◧◩◪
3. atlasu+Pq[view] [source] 2023-03-01 12:33:14
>>andrep+io
Isn't that the point that it wasn't founded as a corporation, nor by Sam Altman?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI#:~:text=The%20organizat....

◧◩◪◨
4. IncRnd+lx[view] [source] 2023-03-01 13:18:58
>>atlasu+Pq
"Non-profit" refers to the tax-exempt status. "Corporation" is an organizational structure. The designations do not have to overlap but sometimes do. [1] It isn't clear from the wiki page whether it was founded as a corporation or not. The content of the filings are the only way to tell.

[1] https://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-nonprofit...

[go to top]