zlacker

[return to "The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web"]
1. emacdo+hQ[view] [source] 2023-02-24 01:30:32
>>taubek+(OP)
I recommend using an ad-blocker while visiting that site :-/

Lately, I find myself using more and more plugins to make the "modern web" tolerable. To list a few:

Channel Blocker (lets me block channels from search results on Youtube); uBlock Origin; Disconnect; F.B Purity; Consent-O-Matic (auto fill cookie consent forms); Kagi Search; PopUpOFF; Facebook Container; Privacy Badger; ClearURLs; Return YouTube Dislike

Basically, if I visit a website and don't like the experience, I either never go back (Kagi lets me exclude it from search results) or find a plugin to make it tolerable.

What I really want now is the ability to exclude entire websites from any permissions I grant to plugins. I feel like in the last year, I've read a couple stories about companies buying successful plugins and then using them to track you or show ads or whatever. I'm worried this will be the next stage in the battle for our attention -- best case: companies will buy popular plugins to track us and show us intrusive ads; worst case: nefarious actors will buy them to scrape information we think is private and collect it.

IE: I just want to be able to say "Hey, Firefox... those permissions that I granted to plugins x, y, and z? They don't apply to www.myfavoritebank.example.com"

Is there a browser that has that feature yet? I spent a few hours trying to figure out if Firefox did. It did not appear to.

edit: Added semicolons to separate plugins in list b/c HN stripped the newlines from my comment.

◧◩
2. nulbyt+J01[view] [source] 2023-02-24 02:49:24
>>emacdo+hQ
> Channel Blocker (lets me block channels from search results on Youtube)...

I wish this were possible for the phone app. Every now and then I am recommended a video from one YouTuber in particular that I can't stand. Is there an app for that? I don't think you can block within YouTube, which would be great.

◧◩◪
3. emacdo+o21[view] [source] 2023-02-24 03:03:05
>>nulbyt+J01
I don't think so (I looked). Best I could find was some articles online claiming you can add "-unwantedChannel '...'" to your YouTube search to exclude individual channels. I didn't even test it because it would be WAY to cumbersome. Maybe that's all Channel Blocker does under the covers -- add a bunch of those switches to my search.

What frustrates me the most is that this is one place where mine and Google's interests actually align! Let me help train them to not show me crap I don't want to see... then I'll use their products (YouTube and Search) more and give them more opportunities to show me ads! (Well, theoretically -- I block as many ads as I can right now).

That was one of the big reasons I looked for an alternative to Google search. IIRC, you used to be able to exclude results from Google search. In order to do so, you HAD TO LOGIN TO GOOGLE (another huge win for Google!). Now I use Kagi -- primarily because they allow me to exclude sites from their search results.

◧◩◪◨
4. rcarr+c31[view] [source] 2023-02-24 03:09:54
>>emacdo+o21
Doesn't help for searching for new stuff, but you can subscribe to channels using rss feeds. From my experience, it helps avoid getting sucked down the YouTube rabbit hole
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pmoria+pD1[view] [source] 2023-02-24 09:03:06
>>rcarr+c31
You can almost certainly be uniquely identified from the combination of feeds your RSS reader polls regularly, combined with your location, if the feeds alone are not enough.

The more feeds you subscribe to, the more unique your fingerprint.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. rcarr+W52[view] [source] 2023-02-24 13:32:49
>>pmoria+pD1
Last time I checked I wasn't get any ads in my RSS reader though
[go to top]