zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. aflag+jN[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:55:16
>>GavCo+(OP)
I'm a non-native English speaker. What's wrong with screeching?
◧◩
2. DanHul+aO[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:01:44
>>aflag+jN
"Screeching" in english (at least North American english) is typically a gendered derogative. You generally wouldn't say a man was "screeching", not unless you also wanted to imply he was effeminate.

By avoiding the word, you avoid insinuating the target's gender is part of the issue, and/or avoid insinuating that the target is effeminate when they "should not" be, i.e. you avoid homophobia.

◧◩◪
3. Nicksi+TP[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:15:07
>>DanHul+aO
>"Screeching" in english [...] is typically a gendered [...].

It's not.

>You generally wouldn't say a man was "screeching".

Sure you would. I've never seen it posed any other way or with any other intent.

◧◩◪◨
4. Beldin+PR[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:28:58
>>Nicksi+TP
Screeching typically concerns loud, high-pitched, emotional screaming (my connotation, backed up by a quick google).

I am under the impression that, on average, men's voices are lower than women's voices. Hence some connotation.

Doesn't mean men cannot screech, though. Just that there is some reason for making that connection, so at least some folks will make that connection.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. gramie+a51[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:23:13
>>Beldin+PR
I would associate "screeching" with women, just as I would associate "bellowing" with men.

I fail to understand why using these words is bad, though.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Taylor+7v1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 06:46:42
>>gramie+a51
It ends up being used to dismiss women levying legitimate criticism. It basically gets used to enforce patriarchy. In practice the opposite is not really true of “bellowing” to the same extent. But even then, gendered insults are falling out of favor in general.
[go to top]