zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. aflag+jN[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:55:16
>>GavCo+(OP)
I'm a non-native English speaker. What's wrong with screeching?
◧◩
2. DanHul+aO[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:01:44
>>aflag+jN
"Screeching" in english (at least North American english) is typically a gendered derogative. You generally wouldn't say a man was "screeching", not unless you also wanted to imply he was effeminate.

By avoiding the word, you avoid insinuating the target's gender is part of the issue, and/or avoid insinuating that the target is effeminate when they "should not" be, i.e. you avoid homophobia.

◧◩◪
3. jquery+7g1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 04:02:28
>>DanHul+aO
>"Screeching" in english (at least North American english) is typically a gendered derogative.

When HN can't tolerate such an obviously true statement such as this, yet plenty of dog-whistles supporting homophobia and racism and transphobia in this thread stay upvoted, it tells me I probably shouldn't be spending time here anymore. I don't know if I've changed or the community has changed. Probably a bit of both. Maybe it's time to grow up and move on.

◧◩◪◨
4. traffi+nn1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 05:09:36
>>jquery+7g1
Until I saw your comment, I interpreted the downvoting as people taking issue with the astonishing lack of self awareness and bizarrely neurotic hypothetical purity spiral at the end.

IE: Describing a straight male as shrill might make passersby assume he’s abnormal and abnormal men are viewed as homosexual and it would be really awful if you accidentally did a homophobia so stop using the word shrill.

[go to top]