zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. aflag+jN[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:55:16
>>GavCo+(OP)
I'm a non-native English speaker. What's wrong with screeching?
◧◩
2. DanHul+aO[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:01:44
>>aflag+jN
"Screeching" in english (at least North American english) is typically a gendered derogative. You generally wouldn't say a man was "screeching", not unless you also wanted to imply he was effeminate.

By avoiding the word, you avoid insinuating the target's gender is part of the issue, and/or avoid insinuating that the target is effeminate when they "should not" be, i.e. you avoid homophobia.

◧◩◪
3. tptace+yO[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:03:32
>>DanHul+aO
Is it? I think you have to kind of want it to be gendered.
◧◩◪◨
4. ilyt+nP[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:09:35
>>tptace+yO
Screeching is usually associated with high pitched sounds and that is associated with women, to the point men making loud high pitched noises usually gets called "screamed like little girl".

I guess babies also count for screeching.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tptace+fS[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:31:54
>>ilyt+nP
I mostly associate screeching with owls and monkeys, neither of which are coded feminine.

To be clear (and conciliatory): I see how you connect the dots here. I just think you have to have your antennae extended extra high to pick this signal up, high enough that you'll need to be careful walking under overpasses and stuff.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. cozzyd+Ze1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 03:51:53
>>tptace+fS
While engaging in linguistic pedantry, antennae are for insects, antennas are for signals.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. tptace+Bj1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 04:34:46
>>cozzyd+Ze1
What the fuck

https://grammarist.com/usage/antennae-antennas/

I can't even.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. cozzyd+xm1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 05:01:57
>>tptace+Bj1
I only know this because I work with antennas a lot (and thankfully, never with antennae).
[go to top]