zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?"]
1. dual_d+ha[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:18:31
>>grader+(OP)
The "I" in AI is just complete bullshit and I can't understand why so many people are in a awe of a bit of software that chains words to another based on some statistical model.

The sad truth is that ChatGPT is about as good an AI as ELIZA was in 1966, it's just better (granted: much better) at hiding its total lack of actual human understanding. It's nothing more than an expensive parlor trick, IMHO.

Github CoPilot? Great, now I have to perform the most mentally taxing part of developing software, namely understanding other people's code (or my own from 6 months ago...) while writing new code. I'm beyond thrilled ...

So, no, I don't have an AI fatigue, because we absolutely have no AI anywhere. But I have a massive bullshit and hype fatigue that is getting worse all the time.

◧◩
2. sfpott+Ta[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:21:45
>>dual_d+ha
“AI” isn’t bull shit, it’s correctly labeled. It’s intelligence which is artificial: i.e. fake, ersatz, specious, not genuine… It’s our fault for not just reading the label. (I absolutely agree with your post and your viewpoint, just to be clear!)
◧◩◪
3. Diggse+Cb[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:25:50
>>sfpott+Ta
"Artificial" is not synonymous with "fake". "Fake" implies a level of deception.
◧◩◪◨
4. sfpott+Ac[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:32:39
>>Diggse+Cb
Not necessarily true. People talk about “fake meat” all the time but it’s clear there’s no level of fraudulence implied by this usage. It’s meant in the sense of “artificial meat”. There are multiple ways the word “fake” is used, and one is as a synonym for “artificial”.

However, in this case, it does seem that there is a level of fraudulence and deception. Given that “fake” often is used exactly the way you say, maybe “fake intelligence” would indeed be a more appropriate term.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bluebl+Rd[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:39:58
>>sfpott+Ac
Have you been around people who say "fake meat?" Every time I've heard it, it was said derisively and implied fraudulent meat.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. sfpott+ag[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:54:43
>>bluebl+Rd
Yes. I’ve heard loads of people refer to it as fake without an implied pejorative meaning.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. bluebl+Pn[view] [source] 2023-02-09 13:40:30
>>sfpott+ag
The people I know that like it use artificial and the people that won't try it use fake.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. sfpott+Ss[view] [source] 2023-02-09 14:03:43
>>bluebl+Pn
Fascinating. Not all people are the same. Who’d have thought?
[go to top]