zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?"]
1. dual_d+ha[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:18:31
>>grader+(OP)
The "I" in AI is just complete bullshit and I can't understand why so many people are in a awe of a bit of software that chains words to another based on some statistical model.

The sad truth is that ChatGPT is about as good an AI as ELIZA was in 1966, it's just better (granted: much better) at hiding its total lack of actual human understanding. It's nothing more than an expensive parlor trick, IMHO.

Github CoPilot? Great, now I have to perform the most mentally taxing part of developing software, namely understanding other people's code (or my own from 6 months ago...) while writing new code. I'm beyond thrilled ...

So, no, I don't have an AI fatigue, because we absolutely have no AI anywhere. But I have a massive bullshit and hype fatigue that is getting worse all the time.

◧◩
2. nunodo+Ca[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:20:21
>>dual_d+ha
I can say with a certain degree of confidence that you haven't actually used CoPilot daily.
◧◩◪
3. dual_d+xc[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:32:18
>>nunodo+Ca
I haven't. Now you know for a fact :)

What I have seen about it ranged from things that can be nearly just as well handled by your $EDITOR's snippet functionality to things where my argument kicked in - I have to verify this generated code does what I want, ergo I have to read and understand something not written by me. Paired with the at least somewhat legally and ethical questionable source of the training data, this is not for me.

◧◩◪◨
4. Otek+Le[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:44:38
>>dual_d+xc
So stop evangelizing about stuff you haven’t used. Understanding code is easier than writing it from the scratch. That’s why code review doesn’t take as much time as writing code and you still need to prove your code works, even if you wrote it yourself.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. selbyk+Df[view] [source] 2023-02-09 12:51:04
>>Otek+Le
Understanding code is only easier for simple tasks. I've definitely had copilot spit out complex algorithms that looked right at first glance but actually had major issues that required me to write it from scratch.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Otek+3n[view] [source] 2023-02-09 13:35:23
>>selbyk+Df
Thats why you test, this could also happen with code you wrote so it’s not an argument against copilot. Did you wrote your “complex algorithm” and then run and debugged it in your head? No, you’ve tested it. Do the same with Copilots code
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. cmccon+6s[view] [source] 2023-02-09 14:00:13
>>Otek+3n
If testing is the equalizer, there is no difference between black box code and something you fully understand. Which fair enough, is how ML works in general.
[go to top]