zlacker

>>i13e+(OP)
Microsoft's integration of ChatGPT with Bing is really bad. No-one wants a busy search page with a side-bar of ChatGPT; what's the point of that?

The correct interface for ChatGPT + search is just...ChatGPT. But it can also show you a list of web search results, when it's appropriate.

A super-clean interface, that always shows you exactly what you want.

That would be a killer feature and represent a real threat to Google.

>>dilap+1b
As someone else said, the problem is ChatGPT lies straight to your face, whereas at least Google's answers are based on structured data by someone. It's traceable, whereas I would not trust ChatGPT ever to tell me the correct temperature to cook a steak.

>>mattwa+Xc
"The new Bing also cites all its sources". That's a quote from the microsoft announcement.

https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/02/07/reinventing-sear...

>>wcoene+zf
And users of the New Bing will certainly verify that the sources say what ChatGPT claims they do?

>>bergie+ak
If they don’t, then the traceability of traditional search results is just as useless.

>>mister+2p
Traditional search practically forces you to read the sources directly. With ChatGPT, people will just assume its citation is correct due to laziness.

I've seen this with many human published articles on the Internet too. The litany of citations fool everyone into thinking that the article is credible, but when I actually read the citations, they don't support the article at all.