zlacker

>>i13e+(OP)
> Once trained on this giant corpus of natural language, the chatbot can, when prompted by users’ instructions, produce a fluently written answer rather than merely serving up a list of links.

A word salad of untrustworthy bullshit instead of the pages you were looking for is not going to upend search.

It's not a replacement for search in any way.

Now if the search engine could find pages which satisfy complex queries in natural language, referencing content and relationships among content, that could be something.

>>kazina+xr
But google (nor bing) return the pages you're looking for even close to as reliably now as they did before. If Microsoft can somehow work out the issues with factual accuracy in the gpt interface (and salvage the bing brand) they're going to have a winning product on their hands.