zlacker

>>i13e+(OP)
While Google certainly has its faults and I am frustrated with its trajectory, I would bet money that this is an article pushing the nonsensical notion that AI language models will replace search engines.

Edit: based on the subtitle, it seems like I am correct.

>>chias+l9
How is that nonsensical? Seems quite likely to me, especially if they can ground them better in a factual knowledge base. Most search engine queries are looking for information.

>>rileyp+3a
The problem is that this literally does not exist today. ChatGPT is a chatbot, it has no factual knowledge base. It's optimized for dialogue.

That's why it's absolutely nonsensical to see all these articles, because they are talking about a chatbot as if it's trivial to turn it into a search machine. That's an entirely different problem.

>>phailh+ee
ChatGPT is pretty much the definition of a troll. It's only mission in life is to keep you talking to it. To do that it has no problem with lying, confusing, and various other deceitful methods you wouldn't accept from a human.