zlacker

[return to "“How America took out the Nord Stream pipeline”"]
1. dang+Jl1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 18:31:00
>>hungle+(OP)
All: Whether he is right or not or one likes him or not, Hersh reporting on this counts as significant new information (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...), so I've turned off the flags on this submission.

If you're going to comment in this thread, please make sure you're up on the site guidlelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) and note this one: "Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive." We don't want political or nationalistic flamewar here, and any substantive point can be made without it.

◧◩
2. swader+MB1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:28:41
>>dang+Jl1
Why even question Hersh on this when Biden publicly admitted they would put an end to it? https://youtu.be/OS4O8rGRLf8
◧◩◪
3. ceejay+AF1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:42:26
>>swader+MB1
Because "put an end to it" can easily (and more plausibly) encompass approaches like "sanction Nord Stream AG into the ground".
◧◩◪◨
4. swader+XH1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:52:08
>>ceejay+AF1
"There will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it."
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ceejay+PJ1[view] [source] 2023-02-08 19:59:51
>>swader+XH1
There is no longer an Enron, either. No one blew up their headquarters to do it.
[go to top]