zlacker

[return to "Apple attempting to stop investigation into its practices involving browsers"]
1. BirAda+ug[view] [source] 2023-01-24 11:15:02
>>samwil+(OP)
I feel 2 ways about this. If Apple is forced to open up, Chrome will take everything. If Apple can keep Safari in place, there are at least 2 browsers. OTOH, it’s a crap thing to do to your customers, forcing a browser on them.
◧◩
2. cactus+lz[view] [source] 2023-01-24 13:37:34
>>BirAda+ug
Apple should be forced to show users a screen where they select the browser they want to install when purchasing or upgrading iOS. There are more browsers than Safari and Chrome.
◧◩◪
3. hbn+KG[view] [source] 2023-01-24 14:17:59
>>cactus+lz
For god's sake NO, that would be the final nail in the coffin of Google owning web standards. 99% of users would choose Chrome because it's what they recognize most, and I assume in this scenario you're imagining this is actually different browsers using their own rendering engines.

I don't understand why in this world of Google's near monopoly on the web, people are more focused on government intervention to prevent Apple's pithy 9% marketshare for holding back poor Google.

◧◩◪◨
4. cactus+YM[view] [source] 2023-01-24 14:47:57
>>hbn+KG
Not necessarily. If Brave can somehow present that it blocks ads and trackers many users will choose it over Chrome.
[go to top]