zlacker

>>signa1+(OP)
I am the author and I am really regret about this title. I think a better title should be "How to Use AVX512 in Golang via the C Compiler" :O

>>zhengh+Nu5
Another suggestion for the title: Go, not Golang.

>>fulafe+y66
This is a hill I am also willing to die on.

Last time this annoyed me, I did a thorough look at the Go source code to figure out how accurate calling the language "Go" is. Basically, aside from the mailing lists and bug tracker URLs, "golang" only appears in one place; the ppc64 port contributed by IBM. Everywhere else in the code, it refers to itself as "Go".

>>jrockw+Mi6
Is discarding the primary communications channels for the project a valid decision? In addition, the main website of the project was "golang.org" for over a decade. That domain still redirects to the current homepage at go.dev.

>>stonog+t38
Ruby is at ruby-lang.org but I've never heard anyone call it Rubylang. You can't always get the domain name (or Google Group) you want.