zlacker

>>zacwes+(OP)
Why only Stability AI and not OpenAI?

>>chrisc+y2
Going against a less well-funded company makes a favorable outcome more likely. Further, they only need a precedent - a ruling against SD would also apply to Dall-E.

>>supriy+w3
Makes sense. Does that mean OpenAI could essentially help fund Stability AI’s defense then?

>>chrisc+2j
I think they should. A lot of law is about precedent.

AI-focused companies should get together, form a group, and have real experts giving expert testimony under oath.

I also think that the courts will form expert committees consisting of real experts like Bengio, LeCun, etc.

Any grifters should be avoided, but I am not sure if the judges will understand the difference.