zlacker

[return to "The Twitter Files, Part Six"]
1. leoh+eM[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:20:40
>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.
◧◩
2. kodyo+yN[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:31:08
>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.
◧◩◪
3. wesley+lO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:37:40
>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.
◧◩◪◨
4. transc+q21[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:26:24
>>wesley+lO
Here you go:

https://www.dhillonlaw.com/lawsuits/meghan-murphy-twitter/

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ciler+g71[view] [source] 2022-12-17 05:10:42
>>transc+q21
This isn't an example of someone being banned for being on the political right.

Meghan Murphy is a left-wing feminist, she was banned for expressing gender critical views.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. skinny+hf1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 06:39:35
>>ciler+g71
TERFs are not left-wing. The left wants nothing to do with TERFs. There is almost no way you’re talking in good faith when calling a TERF left-wing.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. ciler+rF1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 12:00:35
>>skinny+hf1
I think you may be surprised at how many 'TERFs' are dyed-in-the-wool socialists. I know it's convenient to paint this as some left-right political split, but the truth of the matter is quite different. Look up the history of radical feminism - it didn't originate on the political right, quite the opposite.

Meghan Murphy in particular is a left-wing, socialist, radical feminist, who was raised in a Marxist household. This is no secret, you can search her work online to confirm all this, she's pro-unions, pro-socialism, and speaks against the right on numerous political matters.

Her ban from Twitter was caused by referring to a male (Johnathan/Jessica Yaniv), who was suing female beauticians for refusing to wax his bollocks, as "him".

Now I don't know about you, but I would think if you're going around flashing your testicles to women and demanding they touch them, that is very much a proof of being a man. I mean, you don't find women popping their hairy balls out to be plucked, and haranguing women who politely demur, do you?

Nonetheless, Twitter moderators disagreed. To them, this was the bushy scrotum of a woman. So Murphy was canned.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. skinny+zMC[view] [source] 2022-12-29 05:06:21
>>ciler+rF1
You can't be (a) a socialist and (b) not believe trans people are the gender they identify with

It goes against the essence of socialism and communism.

I know who TERF non-socialist Meghan Murphy is. You can see here that she is not a leftist: https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/06/08/why-i-left-the-left...

She keeps saying she is. She doesn't understand (I mean I'm sure she does, but she's a lying bigot) that socialism and all the wonders of it don't work if youre being a SWERF and TERF. Things don't work that way. You have to want better conditions for every one. Otherwise...how are we giving people equal chances to succeed?

I think the problem is the vast majority of people have no clue what socialism is. Most people have read no socialist texts, but are inundated with right wing and capitalistic propaganda all the time.

tldr: SWERFs and TERFs are not leftists. Like how people like Jordan Peterson (before), Tim Pool, Dave Rubin are all right wingers through and through, but keep pretending they are centrists. You have to act the act. Not just talk. This applies to Meghan Murphy too.

I have spent dozens and dozens and dozens of hours getting into TERFs. Radical feminism didn't originate on the political right, but at this point trans people are dying and in danger. This is abundantly clear to any dyed-in-the-wool socialists in the 2020s. Even if it wasn't clear decades ago. Or even a decade ago.

Unfortunately you showed your true colors deadnaming Jessica and using the incorrect pronouns.

[go to top]