zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.

>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.

>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.

>>wesley+lO
Here you go:

https://www.dhillonlaw.com/lawsuits/meghan-murphy-twitter/

>>transc+q21
Referring to a trans person by the wrong gender repeatedly is a good example of hate speech.

It reminds of an old joke:

Conservative: "I keep getting banned for my views"

Rando: "Oh, small government?"

C: "No, not that one"

R: "Oh, so fiscal responsibility?"

C: "Not that either"

R: "So which ones?"

C: "Oh, uh... You know."

>>Shared+E51
No it’s not. Referring to a trans person by the wrong pronouns repeatedly is just rude. It isn’t hate speech

That’s just watering down what hate speech is.

>>Khaine+Un1
Speech designed to

A) Harm the target, who has gone out of their way to avoid that harm already (by transitioning/changing pronouns)

B) Dehumanize the target in the eyes of others (this person doesn't matter, their wishes are to be entirely disrespected)

seems like a reasonable candidate for hate speech to me.

>>Shared+yC2
Pointing out that a man who desires to be a woman is still really a man, is an act of speech that neither causes him harm nor dehumanizes him.

It's very silly to claim that this is some type of hate.

>>bennie+v23
Aww, look at you making a throwaway to respond to my comments, it's cute :3

E: Removed the troll feeding bits.

>>Shared+433
See, you know it doesn't really make any sense to call this hate speech, otherwise you wouldn't have deflected into accusations of trolling.

>>bennie+b53
Then come back with your real handle and we'll talk. If you're not willing to interact in good faith, it is only safe to assume that you are a troll.

>>Shared+B53
You are still deflecting.

>>bennie+O63
Ugh, fine.

> neither causes harm

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/transphobia#effect...

> Nor dehumanizes

Intentionally causing harm (see above) and pushing for it to be acceptable for others to cause harm is in fact dehumanizing.

I note you still fail to present any argument other than "I feel like you're wrong"