zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.

>>leoh+eM
It's corruption. It's a violation of the First Amendment. It's a dangerous collusion between state and media. We should all be concerned.

>>joshua+3P
It's literally none of those things.

The FBI contacted trust and safety and said 'Hey we have concerns about these tweets'. Twitter decided to take them down in some cases.

Who is corrupted here? Twitter for taking reports and then deciding how to react to them? The FBI for finding misinformation that might lead to crazies creating mass casualty events?

The FBI at no time FORCED twitter to do anything. So it's not violating the first amendment.

>>sleepy+SP
The corruption is that the requests were ideologically based. In other words, they only requested conservative tweets to be removed.

>>joshua+CU
That isn't reflected in the evidence posted.

>>etchal+MZ
It's been plain to see for years.

>>joshua+oh2
And yet, despite unfettered access to Twitter's internal communications, evidence has yet to be posted by the journalists tasked with exposing that fact.