zlacker

[return to "The Twitter Files, Part Six"]
1. leoh+eM[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:20:40
>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.
◧◩
2. kodyo+yN[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:31:08
>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.
◧◩◪
3. time_t+bO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:36:29
>>kodyo+yN
I'm seriously out of the loop on this, what were the actual crimes?
◧◩◪◨
4. wesley+uO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:38:36
>>time_t+bO
More accurately. What was the political speech banned?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tomoha+hQ[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:52:44
>>wesley+uO
The NY Post was banned for breaking a story about revelations contained in a laptop computer abandoned by Hunter Biden. This was just prior to a national election. The FBI was involved in pushing this narrative through Twitter.

The Babylon Bee is a satire site that was banned for doing satire.

There are many many examples.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. favori+CR[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:01:43
>>tomoha+hQ
The Babylon Bee was not banned, the same way someone who tries to go into a store without shoes on isn't "banned." They just need to put on some shoes, then you're allowed in.

The Babylon Bee was told that 1 Tweet violated Twitter's policy, and that they needed to delete it to unlock their account. They chose not to.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. kQq9oH+i01[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:05:43
>>favori+CR
"All you need to do is renounce your values and violate your principles. What's the big deal?"
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. favori+sq1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 09:05:02
>>kQq9oH+i01
lmao "Twitter made me delete a Tweet that violated their ToS if I want to keep using their platform" is equivalent to renouncing all of your principles and values??
[go to top]