zlacker

[return to "The Twitter Files, Part Six"]
1. leoh+eM[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:20:40
>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.
◧◩
2. kodyo+yN[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:31:08
>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.
◧◩◪
3. wesley+lO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:37:40
>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.
◧◩◪◨
4. transc+q21[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:26:24
>>wesley+lO
Here you go:

https://www.dhillonlaw.com/lawsuits/meghan-murphy-twitter/

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Shared+E51[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:53:19
>>transc+q21
Referring to a trans person by the wrong gender repeatedly is a good example of hate speech.

It reminds of an old joke:

Conservative: "I keep getting banned for my views"

Rando: "Oh, small government?"

C: "No, not that one"

R: "Oh, so fiscal responsibility?"

C: "Not that either"

R: "So which ones?"

C: "Oh, uh... You know."

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Khaine+Un1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 08:35:09
>>Shared+E51
No it’s not. Referring to a trans person by the wrong pronouns repeatedly is just rude. It isn’t hate speech

That’s just watering down what hate speech is.

[go to top]