zlacker

[return to "The Twitter Files, Part Six"]
◧
1. leoh+eM[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:20:40
>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.
◧◩
2. kodyo+yN[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:31:08
>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.
◧◩◪
3. wesley+lO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:37:40
>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.
◧◩◪◨
4. simple+eP[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:45:25
>>wesley+lO
It's very convenient that one side of the asile is always in a position to define what hate speech is.

Neat trick, but it doesn't work anymore.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. roflye+HQ[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:55:38
>>simple+eP
Not a trick, but yeah saying we should harm certain groups of people is hate speech.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. kodyo+hS[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:05:44
>>roflye+HQ
Joking about political figures isn't hate speech.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Shared+um1[view] [source] 2022-12-17 08:17:36
>>kodyo+hS
Just because it's about a political figure doesn't make something not hate speech.

If someone drops an n-word at a state rep, does it become not hate speech? The answer is (obviously) that hate speech is still hate speech.

[go to top]