zlacker

[return to "The Twitter Files, Part Six"]
◧
1. leoh+eM[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:20:40
>>GavCo+(OP)
Learned basically nothing here. So the FBI helped Twitter with content moderation? Who gives a crap.
◧◩
2. kodyo+yN[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:31:08
>>leoh+eM
They were going after political speech while ignoring actual crimes.
◧◩◪
3. wesley+lO[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:37:40
>>kodyo+yN
Oh please. Link to where Twitter banned someone for being right wing. Hate speech doesn't count.
◧◩◪◨
4. simple+eP[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:45:25
>>wesley+lO
It's very convenient that one side of the asile is always in a position to define what hate speech is.

Neat trick, but it doesn't work anymore.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. roflye+HQ[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:55:38
>>simple+eP
Not a trick, but yeah saying we should harm certain groups of people is hate speech.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. simple+SR[view] [source] 2022-12-17 03:03:15
>>roflye+HQ
Who is saying that people should be harmed? Seriously. Whoever you have in mind, if they're actually advocating violence against people then I'm in agreement with you. That's not cool and they shouldn't be doing that.

Are you referring to calling a trans person by their biological sex?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Shared+m41[view] [source] 2022-12-17 04:43:15
>>simple+SR
Putting aside transphobic nonsense

> Who is saying that people should be harmed?

The rights actions speak so loud no one can hear their words.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/17/briefing/right-wing-mass-...

https://www.businessinsider.com/right-wing-extremists-kill-3...

https://www.salon.com/2021/06/25/filling-the-trump-void-righ...

[go to top]