zlacker

>>GavCo+(OP)
I used to hear that it wasn't censorship when it was just a company censoring voices. That they didn't have any obligations to broadcast anyones speech.

Well... that didn't age well.

>>rosmax+73
I used to hear talk of free speech absolutism, and not banning jet tracking accounts even though they were a safety risk.

>>someNa+p5
They aren't a safety risk though.

>>salawa+mb
He previously said the safety risk was ok as banning it would violate free speech.

And Musk has been fine with accounts that use their freedom of speech even if they resulted is safety risks. For example @libsoftiktok is an account Musk unbanned, and has likes their tweets, who post misleading information resulting in direct threats against people and organisations (e.g. children's hospitals).

For example they just recently tweeted a video* that was purposefully edited in a way to make it seem someone was pro-pedophilia, when they weren't.

*https://twitter.com/RobertLouisr/status/1603422570665201664?...