zlacker

[return to "Twitter applies 7-day suspension to half a dozen journalists"]
1. jrmg+LI[view] [source] 2022-12-16 06:21:02
>>prawn+(OP)
Musk on November 6th:

My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk

https://mobile.twitter.com/elonmusk/status/15894149585086914...

◧◩
2. bigiai+xN[view] [source] 2022-12-16 06:51:58
>>jrmg+LI
“I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that’s what free speech means” —@elonmusk 20220425

https://twitter.com/artywah/status/1603592195046400000

(I don’t have a direct link to that tweet, but I’m confident that screenshot tweet isn’t faked.)

Edit: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1518623997054918657

◧◩◪
3. camjoh+bP[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:03:39
>>bigiai+xN
And in the 3 minute call where he popped onto a Twitter space tonight, he now says doxxing is zero tolerance and journalists aren't above the rules. But the alleged "doxxing" was the journalist doing nothing more than linking to the @elonjet account.

@elonjet can be found on Mastodon at https://mastodon.social/@elonjet

Incredibly, links to Mastodon instances are now flagged as a safety risk on Twitter.

Video of the Twitter spaces meeting, until this link gets removed: https://twitter.com/ForeverEversley/status/16036127708929187...

◧◩◪◨
4. Laaas+mQ[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:11:28
>>camjoh+bP
Honestly, I was on the side that expected Twitter to get better (like pg), and have mostly not been against any of what he's done until now, but this seems like a bad decision all around.

I assume he got emotional because his child was involved, then did this in a fit of rage, and is now unable to admit that he was wrong. There is no way you can look at this and say what he did was right, no matter what political stance you have.

A newly created rule, the violation of which isn't clear either.

I suppose this is unavoidable if you give one person complete control over a platform. Perhaps it should be illegal for big social media platforms to have a shareholder with over 50% of the voting power.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. roenxi+dS[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:25:13
>>Laaas+mQ
I have no expectations around whether Twitter gets better or worse. The incentives have not changed, and the incentives point in the direction of the likes of the New York Times or Fox News.

But it isn't obvious that this decision is bad. What is quite clear he has changed his mind on pure free speech - which, realistically, was widely predicted. This isn't a political exercise though, he's just booting a few journalists in a hasty, poorly planned but ultimately not unreasonable policy. There is no ideology that requires a geo-fix on Elon's jet.

Although I'll postfix that all with "yet". People were claiming Alex Jones was the end of it relatively recently, and that story ended with the US president being booted off for partisan reasons.

[go to top]