zlacker

[return to "Who knew the first AI battles would be fought by artists?"]
1. meebob+kc[view] [source] 2022-12-15 13:03:10
>>dredmo+(OP)
I've been finding that the strangest part of discussions around art AI among technical people is the complete lack of identification or empathy: it seems to me that most computer programmers should be just as afraid as artists, in the face of technology like this!!! I am a failed artist (read, I studied painting in school and tried to make a go at being a commercial artist in animation and couldn't make the cut), and so I decided to do something easier and became a computer programmer, working for FAANG and other large companies and making absurd (to me!!) amounts of cash. In my humble estimation, making art is vastly more difficult than the huge majority of computer programming that is done. Art AI is terrifying if you want to make art for a living- and, if AI is able to do these astonishingly difficult things, why shouldn't it, with some finagling, also be able to do the dumb, simple things most programmers do for their jobs?

The lack of empathy is incredibly depressing...

◧◩
2. knight+mr[view] [source] 2022-12-15 14:17:27
>>meebob+kc
If "making art is vastly more difficult than the huge majority of computer programming that is done" - then I'm sorry, you must not be doing very difficult computer programming.
◧◩◪
3. odo124+0G1[view] [source] 2022-12-15 19:40:30
>>knight+mr
the vast majority of computer programming is “not very difficult” computer programming
◧◩◪◨
4. quonn+032[view] [source] 2022-12-15 21:25:13
>>odo124+0G1
Right and why is that? Because there is often no budget to solve the interesting parts and because of a lack of skills and because of terrible management - all of these mutually reinforcing.

Same if true by the way for writing. So? Doesn‘t mean writing well is easy.

[go to top]