zlacker

[return to "Who knew the first AI battles would be fought by artists?"]
1. cardan+G3[view] [source] 2022-12-15 12:15:07
>>dredmo+(OP)
I don't see the point. There is a copyright (and in that regard most of these images are fine) and then there is trademark which they might violate.

Regardless, the human generating and publishing these images is obviously responsible to ensure they are not violating any IP property. So they might get sued by Disney. I don't get why the AI companies would be effected in any way. Disney is not suing Blender if I render an image of Mickey Mouse with it.

Though I am sure that artists might find an likely ally in Disney against the "AI"'s when they tell them about their idea of making art-styles copyright-able Being able to monopolize art styles would be indeed a dream come true for those huge corporations.

◧◩
2. Tepix+B5[view] [source] 2022-12-15 12:27:50
>>cardan+G3
It boils down to this: Do you need permission if you train your AI model with copyrighted things or not?
◧◩◪
3. residu+w9[view] [source] 2022-12-15 12:47:57
>>Tepix+B5
I would argue if people are allowed to see your art for free, so should AI models.
◧◩◪◨
4. bakugo+Iw[view] [source] 2022-12-15 14:39:47
>>residu+w9
AI models are not people.
[go to top]