zlacker

[return to "Who knew the first AI battles would be fought by artists?"]
1. mattde+34[view] [source] 2022-12-15 12:18:42
>>dredmo+(OP)
Challenging to navigate. These demonstrations are technically copyright infringement if done for financial gain (selling a T-shirt with Mickey Mouse icon). The same would be true if you were to draw by hand Mickey Mouse with a gun and sold it on a T-shirt. The only exception would be if it is a clear derivative, or satire, or parody, or personal use of course.

The challenging part is that these artists are protesting the use of 'style' in AI synthesized media. That is, an artist's style is being targeted (or, even, multiple artist's styles are combined in a prompt to create a new AI-original work). This is not protected by copyright—if you draw a new scene in another artist's style, it would be perhaps unethical, but legally derivative work.

If the artists who are challenging these AI systems do get there way, and they are able to legally copy-protect their "style" (like a certain way of brush strokes), this would inevitably backfire against them. To give an example: any artist whose work now too closely resembles the "style" of Studio Ghibli might be liable to copyright infringement, where before the work would be clearly derivative, or just influenced by another work, as is the case with most art over time.

◧◩
2. concor+gm[view] [source] 2022-12-15 13:55:12
>>mattde+34
Trademark infringement, not copyright.
◧◩◪
3. mattde+Vo[view] [source] 2022-12-15 14:07:19
>>concor+gm
Technically, sure, but the artists (who are not trademarking their work) are putting this in the context of copyright infringement.
[go to top]