zlacker

[return to "I asked Signal motivations for SMS removal"]
1. joel35+Ub[view] [source] 2022-10-19 09:01:23
>>quenti+(OP)
With Signal moving away from SMS, the required messaging app stack on my phone just to be able to receive everything sent do me will have to be:

- Signal -> Close friends & family I've convinced to use it.

- WhatsApp -> Most of my friends.

- SMS -> School notifications, 2FA, shipping updates, etc.

- Facebook Messenger -> Elderly relatives

- Telegram -> That one relative who wants to use this instead of Signal.

Is there a consolidated messaging app that the HN community recommends?

I can't be the only one suffering from messenger bloat.

◧◩
2. robobr+rc[view] [source] 2022-10-19 09:07:52
>>joel35+Ub
Matrix
◧◩◪
3. angry_+dk[view] [source] 2022-10-19 10:11:09
>>robobr+rc
Matrix has fundamental security problems that they seem unwilling to fix. Almost a polar opposite to Signal.
◧◩◪◨
4. Aratho+Q32[view] [source] 2022-10-19 19:13:27
>>angry_+dk
This is categorically not true, as per https://matrix.org/blog/2022/09/28/upgrade-now-to-address-en....

The only practical issue raised by https://nebuchadnezzar-megolm.github.io/ which we didn’t already fix is the question over whether servers or clients should control group membership. Our position is that it’s okay for the server to control it as long as clients are warned if malicious users/devices are added. Fixing it properly is Hard: for instance, if you are chatting in a room and it turns out that a remote user kicked another remote user, but the kick was delayed in reaching you, you could keep chatting away encrypting messages for a user who is no longer in the room and theoretically should not be receiving them. Is this a security flaw? Or is this just how causality works? So we’re dealing with problems similar to that; hopefully we will be able to switch to client controlled membership by end of year.

tptacek’s derision is not very constructive.

[go to top]