zlacker

>>davidg+(OP)
Microsoft should just train it on all their proprietary code instead. See how sanguine they are about it then.

>>jonnyc+c5
who said they haven't.

for something to show up verbatim in the output of a textual AI model it needs to be an input many times.

I wonder if the problem is not copilot, but many people using this person's code without license or credit, and copilot being trained on those pieces of code as well. copilot may just be exposing a problem rather than creating one.

I don't know much about AI, and I don't use copilot.

>>naikro+a9
there's exactly no way they have

>>make3+Id
I'm curious how you could possibly know that for sure.

>>naikro+cy
because Microsoft is known to be extremely protective of their code. there is just no way they would expose their internal code to being straight up decoded from the model, while they can just train the model on the huge public data of GitHub