zlacker

[return to "Wikipedia is not short on cash"]
◧
1. mgamac+ya[view] [source] 2022-10-12 10:58:15
>>nickpa+(OP)
It’s not just they are flush with cash. It’s they are funding and fanning the culture war despite claiming to be a neutral party. Some of their funds are being routed to political entities that are not neutral.

Edit: here’s a link to a thread about what I mean:

https://twitter.com/echetus/status/1579776106034757633?s=46&...

◧◩
2. preomm+Ub[view] [source] 2022-10-12 11:10:29
>>mgamac+ya
This is meaningless without stating the context of what you consider violation of neutrality.

True neturality is basically an impossible target.

◧◩◪
3. comman+cB1[view] [source] 2022-10-12 18:05:23
>>preomm+Ub
> True neturality is basically an impossible target

That's probably true, but Wikipedia isn't even pretending to try.

[go to top]