zlacker

>>nickpa+(OP)
It’s not just they are flush with cash. It’s they are funding and fanning the culture war despite claiming to be a neutral party. Some of their funds are being routed to political entities that are not neutral.

Edit: here’s a link to a thread about what I mean:

https://twitter.com/echetus/status/1579776106034757633?s=46&...

>>mgamac+ya
This.

I stopped donating when I saw how politicised they were.

People are people, and will have opinions about things. People of a kind will naturally group together. This is all fine, but it becomes a problem when one of the things that make what you produce worthwhile is neutrality, and you can't keep your politics in your pants.

>>ghusto+Lb
I don't really believe these claims of "Wokepedia", because no-one making these claims has presented actual evidence.

I'm sure you have some though, otherwise commenting as you did would mean you'd be as guilty of "not keeping your politics in your pants" as you accuse Wikipedia of being.

>>Edward+3f
> I don't really believe these claims of "Wokepedia"

I expect this would qualify.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Equity_Fund

which also links to:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/06/03/we-stand-for...

Most people would probably place a lot of this firmly in the "woke" category.