zlacker

[return to "Wikipedia is not short on cash"]
1. mgamac+ya[view] [source] 2022-10-12 10:58:15
>>nickpa+(OP)
It’s not just they are flush with cash. It’s they are funding and fanning the culture war despite claiming to be a neutral party. Some of their funds are being routed to political entities that are not neutral.

Edit: here’s a link to a thread about what I mean:

https://twitter.com/echetus/status/1579776106034757633?s=46&...

◧◩
2. e12e+cb[view] [source] 2022-10-12 11:04:05
>>mgamac+ya
Free access to knowledge isn't a neutral position.

But I gather you think wmf is doing something beyond this? Which side, of which culture war do they support, in your view?

◧◩◪
3. mgamac+me[view] [source] 2022-10-12 11:30:39
>>e12e+cb
They clearly support a left ideology by the editors, but I’m not even talking about that. I mean they send money to support far left anti-science groups.

https://twitter.com/echetus/status/1579779097278181378?s=46&...

◧◩◪◨
4. Edward+nh[view] [source] 2022-10-12 11:51:45
>>mgamac+me
You have a strange definition of far-left, didn't see a single Maoist insurrection in that Twitter link.

Curse of American politics, I guess, when one considers the Democrats to be "left leaning", then your whole political perception is skewed.

(The Democrats are significantly to the right of our centre-right party. People who call them lefties or socialists or commies amuse, confuse, and bemuse me.)

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. concor+Kp[view] [source] 2022-10-12 12:48:14
>>Edward+nh
There isn't a single left-right axis. Instead it's many dimensional.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. the_on+iC[view] [source] 2022-10-12 13:47:29
>>concor+Kp
That’s a bit too complex for the average HN poster.
[go to top]