zlacker

[return to "Wikipedia is not short on cash"]
1. apexal+0e[view] [source] 2022-10-12 11:28:24
>>nickpa+(OP)
Man, Wikipedia is like the best website I can think of. No joke.

No silly 25MB framework, no hype, no popup banners (except the donation), no ads, no tracking, doesn't ask to sign up when I scroll down, no paywall...

Just doing it's thing providing all the world with all knowledge for free, in a lot of languages.

These managers can earn $4 million for all I care.

Hell, I work for a mid-sized company that doesn't even come close to being as useful as Wikipedia and our C-suite earns a million a year.

◧◩
2. throwa+Gr[view] [source] 2022-10-12 12:58:24
>>apexal+0e
I agree 200% with your words about Wikipedia. I am sure that I have spent 1000s (literally) of hours reading Wikipedia, opening my mind to new and interesting ideas. And, learning that I was wrong about long held beliefs. Plus, it is like a huge, free encyclopedia for lower income people in developing countries. The digital footprints are astonishingly large.

In closing, one small joke: About dark / annoying patterns: You forgot my least favourite: When you move the mouse out of tab, lightbox pops up: "Don't leave yet... blah blah blah... sign up for our newsletter!" As if that is going to keep me on the page!

[go to top]