zlacker

[return to "Wikipedia is not short on cash"]
1. tchaff+yl[view] [source] 2022-10-12 12:21:46
>>nickpa+(OP)
This is a hit piece by someone who hates Wikipedia. It should be ignored. If and when someone with far less bias writes an article on Wikimedia finances, I might be interested.
◧◩
2. stewx+en[view] [source] 2022-10-12 12:31:45
>>tchaff+yl
Your comment is the definition of an ad hominem argument: the author is a Bad Person so we should disregard anything he says.

Why don't you respond to the actual claims?

[go to top]