zlacker

[return to "Wikipedia is not short on cash"]
1. Sebb76+47[view] [source] 2022-10-12 10:23:27
>>nickpa+(OP)
> Indeed, in the 2012/13 year the Foundation budgeted for $1.9m to provide all its free information on tap.

To be fair to Wikipedia here, quoting a nearly ten year old figure and comparing it to current earnings in order to prove that their required expenses are low is not that honest.

◧◩
2. nmcela+69[view] [source] 2022-10-12 10:43:09
>>Sebb76+47
Your comment is quite dishonest and not considering the whole context.

> After a decade of professional fund-raising, it has now amassed $400 million of cash as of March

> “WMF has operated in the past without staffing and with very minimal staffing, so clearly it’s _possible_ to host a high traffic website on an absolute shoestring,”

> He put the running costs at $10 million a year. Being generous, as some costs fall every year, let’s double that. Wikipedia can operate quite comfortably with the cash it has already, without running another banner ad, for twenty years.

> So where does the money go? Not on the people doing the actual work on the site, of course.

> Foundation lists 550 employees. Top tier managers earn between $300,000 and $400,000 a year, and dozens are employed exclusively on fund-raising

etc.

[go to top]