zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. kweing+O7[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:10:51
>>rvz+(OP)
Classic Linus.

From the closing paragraph, I feel like he’s under the impression that Rust-advocating contributors are putting Rust’s interests (e.g. “legitimizing it” by getting it in the kernel) above the kernel itself.

◧◩
2. mlindn+9x[view] [source] 2022-10-02 17:29:30
>>kweing+O7
You're completely wrong here. There is no push to "legitimize" Rust by getting it into the kernel. A lot of people want to actively write drivers for Linux without having to use C to do it.

Trying to tweak the kernel to make integration easier in a supposed non-harmful way doesn't harm anything.

◧◩◪
3. yencab+uc1[view] [source] 2022-10-02 21:56:21
>>mlindn+9x
Linus is specifically saying the proposed "tweak" is not desirable.
[go to top]