zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. kweing+O7[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:10:51
>>rvz+(OP)
Classic Linus.

From the closing paragraph, I feel like he’s under the impression that Rust-advocating contributors are putting Rust’s interests (e.g. “legitimizing it” by getting it in the kernel) above the kernel itself.

◧◩
2. magica+Eb[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:34:02
>>kweing+O7
> I feel like he’s under the impression that Rust-advocating contributors are putting Rust’s interests (e.g. “legitimizing it” by getting it in the kernel) above the kernel itself.

I mean the post Linus initially responded to did contain[1] a patch removing a kernel define, asking if anyone had any objections over removing that define, just to make the resulting Rust code a little nicer looking.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/9/19/640

[go to top]