zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. kweing+O7[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:10:51
>>rvz+(OP)
Classic Linus.

From the closing paragraph, I feel like he’s under the impression that Rust-advocating contributors are putting Rust’s interests (e.g. “legitimizing it” by getting it in the kernel) above the kernel itself.

◧◩
2. aaaaaa+69[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:19:01
>>kweing+O7
Is he wrong?
◧◩◪
3. bitexp+3a[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:24:47
>>aaaaaa+69
Does it even matter? Rust does what it does and it was enough of a benefit to include in the kernel. It is a big accomplishment.
[go to top]